Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: XP Home Obsolete sooner than you think!!!
UBCD4Win Forums > Other Support > Software Discussion & Assistance
stidyup
arstechnica.com

QUOTE
The end result is that Windows XP Home will leave Mainstream Support and enter online support on January 1, 2007—in less than a year.

When that day comes, XP Home users may feel left out in the cold, because they will no longer qualify for security updates, and will not be able to purchase support from Microsoft. Finding this situation somewhat alarming, I contacted Microsoft's representation to clarify the matter. A Microsoft spokesman relayed the following to me:

"For consumer products, security updates will be available through the end of the mainstream phase. For Windows XP Home Edition, there will be no security updates after 12/31/06." Regarding paid support for problems unrelated to security patches, I was told that "Users who want to continue to receive support after the Microsoft assisted and paid support offerings have ended may visit the Retired Product Support Options Web site."


Is this a journalist just trying to write a story about nothing or is MS going to ditch XP Home ensuring home consumers have to buy Vista and get the cash tills ringing at Redmond.....

QUOTE
I suspect that Microsoft will grant a stay of execution for Windows XP Home, because the alternative is to create a PR nightmare that would also leave customers fuming. Citing emerging markets in the past, Microsoft extended support for Windows 98 and ME by more than two years, and this decision was made long after Windows XP was released. Microsoft should extend support for Windows XP Home well into 2008. Otherwise users will have to hope that updates to XP Professional meet their needs, but it remains unclear if Windows Update will point XP Home users to updates to XP Professional.
lawson23
QUOTE

Is this a journalist just trying to write a story about nothing or is MS going to ditch XP Home ensuring home consumers have to buy Vista and get the cash tills ringing at Redmond.....

This is a journalist bring to light a bad situation.

I have no doubt that XP Home support will be extended so Microsoft isn't forcing anyone YET.
LittlBUGer
Just upgrade to Pro, as it is so much better, even if it is subtle differences, and be happy. smile.gif
lawson23
QUOTE
as it is so much better


As really there is only minor difference I don't see how you could come to the above conclusion. Also for a standard user the benefit is pretty much zero.

So what does an upgrade to XP Pro cost for an XP home user? This is not the solution though.
SteelTrepid
They won't do it! Look what happened when they announced the end of support for 98. I think this reporter or whatever he calls himself is full of crap and just trying to "create" his own news.

I think we will be safe for many years. Hell, Vista isn't even out yet...how can they stop Home so quickly?
LittlBUGer
Well, I know if you are trying to setup a secure home network with possible shares, Pro is a hell of a lot better. smile.gifOtherwise, as I said before, there are some subtle differences. I had Home for a long while once until I moved to Pro and now I wouldn't ever look back. smile.gif
lawson23
QUOTE
I think this reporter or whatever he calls himself is full of crap and just trying to "create" his own news.


Ok the reporter is not full of crap. It is the truth.

http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/?p1=3221
LittlBUGer
Here's for XP Home:
QUOTE

Mainstream Support Retired: 12/31/2006
Extended Support Retired: N/A


And for XP Pro:
QUOTE

Mainstream Support Retired: 12/31/2006
Extended Support Retired: 12/31/2011


And the same lifecycle for XP Home is for Media Center 2005. tongue.gif
stidyup
That really is ripping people of if the Media Centre life cycle is the same as XP Home.

MS is certainly the best company in the world at annoying it's user base.
lawson23
QUOTE
MS is certainly the best company in the world at annoying it's user base.

This won't happen because they will certainly extend the life cycle. Remember these dates were set a long time ago they will now see the need to extend.

People may think this author is full of "crap" but in my opinion this is what I like to see. Someone that brings things like this to light so that action can start now. In my opinion this was a great article not a "story about nothing".
rdsok
One thing I read on the MS website about this issue that may make this a moot point in some reguard... there are statements about the end of support happening from one year to two or three yrs (depending on which software ) from the last release of a Service Pak so... if MS releases a SP3 ( or 4 etc ) that would extend the timeline by at the least one year if not more.
lawson23
QUOTE
if MS releases a SP3 ( or 4 etc ) that would extend the timeline by at the least one year if not more.


Correct but I thought I read that they were not releasing any other SP's for XP. Well bottom line is they will need to extend it for longer than 12 months (which is what it says) in my opinion but we will see what happens.
stidyup
I read SP3 for XP would be out after vista, that could have changed since then.
lawson23
Don't get me wrong they should release a SP3 and it should be sooner than later. I think if they do release a SP3 it will include some more security enhancements besides just updates like SP2 did. This could be a good reason to wait till after Vista to not steal Vista's release thunder.
mbarnes
So far I have not seen any XP updates that are marked XP Home only or XP Pro only
though there are updates marked XP 32 or XP 64.

Has anyone examined the updates to see if there are different files for Home & Pro versions included in the same package ?

I expect most big businesses will be using XP PRO and not worried and most home and some small business users will be using XP Home and will not notice lack of updates until their PC is so infected with mallware that they are unusable.
(Similar situation exists with free 90 day version of Antivirus software installed on many new PC's)

regards
Mike Barnes
stidyup
News.com

QUOTE
Microsoft is making changes to its support Web site in an attempt to clear up confusion over its plans for the consumer editions of Windows XP.

Until Tuesday night, a posting on Microsoft's Web site stated that support for Windows XP Home and Windows XP Media Center Edition would end on Dec. 31, 2006. That would mean no more security fixes or any other support items, such as warranty claims, for users of those operating system products.

But the posting was incorrect, Ines Vargas, a program manager at Microsoft, told CNET News.com. The Redmond, Wash.-based software maker has now updated the online information to reflect that the the consumer Windows XP editions, along with XP Professional, will be supported until two years after Vista ships, she said. Vista, the long-delayed next update of Windows, is expected to arrive by the end of the year.
SteelTrepid
Knew it was a bunch of BS!!

Several "newsletter" authors have taken some heat from talking about this story. They've gotten angry emails from users, etc. They were just reporting what was on MS's site.

There would be too many angry customers and MS would get too much heat if they quit supporting Home at the end of the year. In these cases we (the customers) actually win most of the time!!
lawson23
Ok this is not a bunch of BS.

If you read the first article this is a Quote from a Microsoft REP.
QUOTE
A Microsoft spokesman relayed the following to me:

QUOTE
"For consumer products, security updates will be available through the end of the mainstream phase. For Windows XP Home Edition, there will be no security updates after 12/31/06." Regarding paid support for problems unrelated to security patches, I was told that "Users who want to continue to receive support after the Microsoft assisted and paid support offerings have ended may visit the Retired Product Support Options Web site."



Now they are trying to look good by saying:
QUOTE
But the posting was incorrect


Truth of the matter is they are doing exactly what I said would happen because of news sites bringing this up. If you read the agreement for licensing before the change they have made the posting was not incorrect. It was exactly as their licensing states. Again not an incorrect post but Microsoft covering up their own tracks to try and make a bad thing look good.

Here is an updated ARS article on the situation.
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060112-5970.html
From the above article and in reference to the News.com article:
QUOTE
This brings me to a confusing aspect of this story. News.com today is running with this story as a "False alarm over Windows support deadline," and Ines Vargas, a program manager at Microsoft, is claiming that this was all a misunderstanding stemming from the company's website. The News.com story doesn't mention my report, which was the only report to investigate the issue, but goes on to explain that in Microsoft's eyes, they're just now bringing the website inline with their own internal thinking on support.

QUOTE
"This was brought to our attention late last week, and since then, we have worked diligently to make the change on the site, which was effective Tuesday night," she said. "It was not a change in support policy. It is reflective of the policy as we understand it."


I find this strange, because I contacted Microsoft's representatives not once but twice on this issue, and they confirmed the support cutoff date that I originally reported (12/31/2006).
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2006 Invision Power Services, Inc.